Anti-defensive bridge petition

[WW.BadMother.com]

while I've appreciated many of the improvements to the app over the past few years, I am not interested in seeing any trickle-aids added to the game. It would ruin the game by removing the only element of skill and determination.

Signed,
WW

[Elmo]

I agree!

[Sparon]

Agreed.

[Saka]

Dislike!

We need fresh blood and the only way to add new players is to make the game easy and less time consuming.

[Frith]

Agree there should be no trickle aid, but they should also get rid of the sync function.
Yes, I use it like everyone else. But just as it takes time and planning to set up trickle, it should take time and planning to set up an attack that lands troops from multiple castles in a ten minute window.

[lsd abuser]

All the defense bridge function is is a trickle sheet. Many clans use third party sites instead of the

9:30x
9:40
9:50
10:00 x

Method for tracking which holes are filled. That's all it is.

[Strutter]

Hate to say it, but there's no way I would still be playing without sync. The last MA prior to sync I sat and launched for 3 hours. I am now close to 350 castles and would never have the time launch a good part of that.

[Torch]

It aids the defender but there are ways to use it against them as well. I don't want to give away my tactics but there are ways to disrupt the bridge and make it inaccurate for the defender.

[Black HerT]

There should be no bridge and no trickle defence
If a player is giving aid during attack there should be a loss in the relief Column based on how many castles are attacking and further it should not allow all attacking players troops to storm the castle all at once.