Trickling is stupid

General Lords & Knights topics

Trickling is stupid

Postby ...CHRIS... » Mon Nov 02, 2015 2:02 am

Really..so a castle surrounded by an army of 20,000 men and yet 51 ppl can sneek in every 10 mins for 50 hours.... Thats a line of ppl like 10 miles long ...lame ...any support to a castle should stop when the first battle round begins ...also if we can see incoming attacks we should be able to attack that force in the field before it gets to the castle
...CHRIS...
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:26 pm

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Saka » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:16 am

Trickling sucks and most players will agree with that but those who spend money on the game have too much to loose so live with that.

Trickling should be limited, maybe no defense bonus after the first round?
Devs should work on multiplying defense bonus but limiting trickle strength so stacking would be better option to defend. 1000 defenders behind the wall should easily kill let's say 5000 attackers.
Saka
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 12:29 am

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Pepelu » Fri Nov 06, 2015 8:06 am

It's stupid and boring.

This will be the reason that finally pushes me away from the game.
Pepelu
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:51 pm

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Walking man » Fri Nov 06, 2015 3:04 pm

Trickling is not fun but where is the strategy otherwise? War is not supposed to be fun.

At that point we might as all play Slotomania.
Walking man
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:02 am

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Walking man » Fri Nov 06, 2015 3:12 pm

Trickling is the only reason I still play. If it wasn't for that we would al have to join the largest alliance to have any chance for survival. I am guessing the person who started this thread is just sore because their dogpiling tactics didn't work. Long live the underdog. :P
Walking man
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:02 am

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Saka » Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:43 pm

Easy solution to fix the game.

Add new units that could destroy the castle. For example 1 point each winning round. This would take care of Trickling since castle would be worthless after few hours.
Saka
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 12:29 am

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Slasher » Sat Nov 07, 2015 10:48 pm

It ads strategy you can break tricking if you know a little skill. Got to trickle offense is a way
Slasher
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 8:03 pm

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Agravaine » Thu Nov 19, 2015 5:09 pm

Theres ways to break the trickle, but it's annoying as fk. But then again stacking is impossible if you got 40 castles under attack.
Agravaine
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby WW.BadMother.com » Mon Dec 14, 2015 4:04 pm

Practice and learn it, it's fun and satisfying. It's the only part of the game that requires skill

In antiquity, there are many examples of small forces repelling much larger armies..usually from within a fortification or via a geographic advantage. Trickling simulates this
WW.BadMother.com
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 3:13 am

Re: Trickling is stupid

Postby Perseus the slayer » Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:17 am

Not only it's not stupid strategy but also it's GREAT PRACTICAL APPROACH TO PUSH your enemy bowing on their knees lol 😜😜😜😜😜
Perseus the slayer
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:56 am

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron