End the Trickle

[Mongo]

just because u cant trickle doesnt mean it should be taken away no offense

[Mongo]

trickling is to gain time for ur alliance members to get help to u if the attack is real

btw u can also trickle reverse

[WindStone]

All you need to do is send or have someone else send an attack offset by 5 minutes to disrupt the timeing of the trickle, so there's no need change the way the game is set up.

[Ozark Howler]

I don't think anyone ever said they couldn't trickle, Mongo

[Kendo]

The thing you all seem to forget is that this is a game. Not real life. There is a game algorithm for calculating battle and the trickle takes advantage of that. If someone is dedicated enough to run a trickle defence then I say go for it.

[Cheers4Beers]

Trickling is a great way to balance the gap between players. A 2000 point player can last against a 10000 point player if the trickle is executed properly. Though remember there is serveral ways to change battle times to get around trickles.

[Strutter]

Yeah being trickled hours if not days is a pain. But it brings out the teamwork in an alliance. Keep the trickle.

[Strutter]

Ozark, agreed on your previous before sync reply. Spent 3 hrs one time launching every 8 to 15 mins, sometimes multiple castles. Battle got down to about a couple hundred and then a 7 hr trickle. Then he went into VM. Lol

[RisingUnit]

I like the idea of a 250-1 sort of ratio. You dont need skill to trickle, and take into account a lot of time it is alliance members helping by using trickle sheet. If there was a ratio, it would take some work on the targets end to ensure proper troop counts are trickling. That, i think, would take more "skill."

[Ozark Howler]

That is where I was going Rising. Thank you for that. It doesn't have to "end" but there should be a balance. 100 or 250 to one would allow people to still trickle while restoring some balance.